Is Michael Redd Better Than Roger Mason Jr.? NBA Stats Decide

The career statistics tell a clear story in this SG comparison. Michael Redd holds the advantage in 5 of 7 key categories, with Points Per Game representing the most decisive gap — a 201.6% difference that separates these two NBA players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Michael Redd's Points Per Game of 19.0 compared to Roger Mason Jr.'s 6.3 represents a 201.6% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Roger Mason Jr. falls 57.4% below the career average of 14.8 in this category while Michael Redd exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Michael Redd's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Three Point %, where Michael Redd posts 38% against Roger Mason Jr.'s 38.3% — virtually identical figures. Roger Mason Jr. can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Three Point % is the statistical ammunition for the Roger Mason Jr. side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

Michael Redd wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 2. The 201.6% gap in Points Per Game alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Michael Redd's statistical superiority in this NBA career comparison.