Comparing Adam Bergen and Cole Kmet Head to Head
The career statistics tell a clear story in this TE comparison. Cole Kmet holds the advantage in 6 of 6 key categories, with Targets representing the most decisive gap — a 1620.8% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
Cole Kmet's Targets of 413 compared to Adam Bergen's 24 represents a 1620.8% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Cole Kmet's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Yards Per Reception, where Adam Bergen posts 8.9 against Cole Kmet's 10.2 — a gap of just 14.6%. Adam Bergen can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 6-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Yards Per Reception is the statistical ammunition for the Adam Bergen side.
The tight end position demands a rare combination of size, athleticism and football IQ. Career receiving production at tight end reflects the ability to dominate as a mismatch weapon, red zone threat and reliable safety valve.
Cole Kmet wins this head to head comparison decisively — 6 categories to 0. The 1620.8% gap in Targets alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Cole Kmet's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.
Who is better, Adam Bergen or Cole Kmet?
Cole Kmet holds the statistical edge, winning 6 of 6 categories in this career comparison. Cole Kmet's Targets of 413 versus Adam Bergen's 24 is the most decisive factor — a 1620.8% difference.
How do Adam Bergen and Cole Kmet compare in Targets?
Adam Bergen career Targets: 24. Cole Kmet career Targets: 413. Cole Kmet leads by 1620.8% — dramatically ahead in this key TE metric.
Who had the better overall career, Adam Bergen or Cole Kmet?
Based on career statistics, Cole Kmet edges Adam Bergen 6-0 across key categories. Cole Kmet's Targets of 413 leads Adam Bergen's 24 by 1620.8%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.