Adrian Arrington vs Eugene Baker: Who Wins on NFL Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Adrian Arrington and Eugene Baker split the statistical categories evenly — 2 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested WR comparisons in NFL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Adrian Arrington's Targets of 12 compared to Eugene Baker's 0 represents a 100% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Adrian Arrington's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Receiving Yards, where Adrian Arrington posts 110 against Eugene Baker's 118 — a gap of just 7.3%. Eugene Baker can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 2-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Receiving Yards is the statistical ammunition for the Eugene Baker side.

Wide receiver evaluation centers on yards and touchdowns, but yards per reception reveals explosiveness while receptions indicate target volume and reliability. The greatest receivers in NFL history excel in all three.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Adrian Arrington claims the tiebreaker through Targets advantage — a 100% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NFL debate.