Is Ainias Smith Better Than Richard Alston? NFL Stats Decide
This is as close as it gets. Ainias Smith and Richard Alston split the statistical categories evenly — 1 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested WR comparisons in NFL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.
Ainias Smith's Targets of 9 compared to Richard Alston's 0 represents a 100% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Ainias Smith's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Games Played, where Ainias Smith posts 7 against Richard Alston's 9 — a gap of just 28.6%. Richard Alston can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 1-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Games Played is the statistical ammunition for the Richard Alston side.
Wide receiver evaluation centers on yards and touchdowns, but yards per reception reveals explosiveness while receptions indicate target volume and reliability. The greatest receivers in NFL history excel in all three.
With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Ainias Smith claims the tiebreaker through Targets advantage — a 100% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NFL debate.
Who is better, Ainias Smith or Richard Alston?
Ainias Smith holds the statistical edge, winning 1 of 2 categories in this career comparison. Ainias Smith's Targets of 9 versus Richard Alston's 0 is the most decisive factor — a 100% difference.
How do Ainias Smith and Richard Alston compare in Targets?
Ainias Smith career Targets: 9. Richard Alston career Targets: 0. Ainias Smith leads by 100% — dramatically ahead in this key WR metric.
Who had the better overall career, Ainias Smith or Richard Alston?
Based on career statistics, Ainias Smith edges Richard Alston 1-1 across key categories. Ainias Smith's Targets of 9 leads Richard Alston's 0 by 100%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
