HEADtoHEADSTATS
A.J. Jenkins
WR · KC
VS
NFL
Armon Binns
WR · KC⚡ 3–2
Home→NFL→A.J. Jenkins vs Armon Binns

A.J. Jenkins vs Armon Binns Career Stats Comparison

↓ Loses
A.J. Jenkins
A.J. Jenkins
WR · KC
VS
NFL
⚡ Winner
Armon Binns
Armon Binns
WR · KC
Career Stats
223
Receiving Yards
277
13.1
Yards Per Reception
11.5
17
Receptions
24
28
Games Played
11
33
Targets
40
Statistical Verdict
Armon Binns Wins
2–3
Category Wins
5 stats compared
Fantasy
No fantasy data available for 2026.
🤖AI Analysis

Few NFL comparisons generate more debate than A.J. Jenkins vs Armon Binns. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Armon Binns takes 3 categories while A.J. Jenkins claims 2, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the WR position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

A.J. Jenkins's Games Played of 28 compared to Armon Binns's 11 represents a 154.5% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for A.J. Jenkins's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Yards Per Reception, where A.J. Jenkins posts 13.1 against Armon Binns's 11.5 — a gap of just 13.9%. A.J. Jenkins can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Yards Per Reception is the statistical ammunition for the A.J. Jenkins side.

Wide receiver evaluation centers on yards and touchdowns, but yards per reception reveals explosiveness while receptions indicate target volume and reliability. The greatest receivers in NFL history excel in all three.

The verdict favors Armon Binns — 3 categories to 2 — but A.J. Jenkins makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for A.J. Jenkins has real statistical ammunition particularly in Yards Per Reception where the gap narrows to just 13.9%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, A.J. Jenkins or Armon Binns?

Armon Binns holds the statistical edge, winning 3 of 5 categories in this career comparison. Armon Binns's Games Played of 28 versus A.J. Jenkins's 11 is the most decisive factor — a 154.5% difference.

How do A.J. Jenkins and Armon Binns compare in Games Played?

A.J. Jenkins career Games Played: 28. Armon Binns career Games Played: 11. A.J. Jenkins leads by 154.5% — dramatically ahead in this key WR metric.

Who had the better overall career, A.J. Jenkins or Armon Binns?

Based on career statistics, Armon Binns edges A.J. Jenkins 3-2 across key categories. Armon Binns's Games Played of 28 leads A.J. Jenkins's 11 by 154.5%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
A.J. Jenkins vs Armon Binns
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here