HEADtoHEADSTATS
Al Wallace
DE · BUF⚡ 4–1
VS
NFL
Cedric Johnson
DE · CIN
Home→NFL→Al Wallace vs Cedric Johnson

Al Wallace vs Cedric Johnson: Who Wins on NFL Stats?

⚡ Winner
Al Wallace
Al Wallace
DE · BUF
VS
NFL
↓ Loses
Cedric Johnson
Cedric Johnson
DE · CIN
Career Stats
159
Tackles
37
23
Sacks
5
4
Interceptions
0
13
Pass Deflections
0
96
Games Played
24
Statistical Verdict
Al Wallace Wins
4–1
Category Wins
5 stats compared
Fantasy
No fantasy data available for 2026.
🤖AI Analysis

The career statistics tell a clear story in this DE comparison. Al Wallace holds the advantage in 4 of 5 key categories, with Sacks representing the most decisive gap — a 360% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Al Wallace's Sacks of 23 compared to Cedric Johnson's 5 represents a 360% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Cedric Johnson falls 88.9% below the career average of 45 in this category while Al Wallace exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Al Wallace's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Pass Deflections, where Al Wallace posts 13 against Cedric Johnson's 0 — a gap of just 100%. Cedric Johnson can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Pass Deflections is the statistical ammunition for the Cedric Johnson side.

Defensive impact in the NFL is notoriously difficult to quantify. Sacks and tackles capture individual production, but disruption, coverage grades and run-stopping ability paint the complete picture of defensive excellence.

Al Wallace wins this head to head comparison decisively — 4 categories to 1. The 360% gap in Sacks alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Al Wallace's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, Al Wallace or Cedric Johnson?

Al Wallace holds the statistical edge, winning 4 of 5 categories in this career comparison. Al Wallace's Sacks of 23 versus Cedric Johnson's 5 is the most decisive factor — a 360% difference.

How do Al Wallace and Cedric Johnson compare in Sacks?

Al Wallace career Sacks: 23. Cedric Johnson career Sacks: 5. Al Wallace leads by 360% — dramatically ahead in this key DE metric.

Who had the better overall career, Al Wallace or Cedric Johnson?

Based on career statistics, Al Wallace edges Cedric Johnson 4-1 across key categories. Al Wallace's Sacks of 23 leads Cedric Johnson's 5 by 360%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
Al Wallace vs Cedric Johnson
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here