HEADtoHEADSTATS
Al Wallace
DE · BUF
VS
NFL
Fletcher Cox
DT · PHI⚡ 5–0
Home→NFL→Al Wallace vs Fletcher Cox

Al Wallace vs Fletcher Cox Career Stats Comparison

↓ Loses
Al Wallace
Al Wallace
DE · BUF
VS
NFL
⚡ Winner
Fletcher Cox
Fletcher Cox
DT · PHI
Career Stats
159
Tackles
519
23
Sacks
70
4
Interceptions
0
13
Pass Deflections
17
96
Games Played
188
Statistical Verdict
Fletcher Cox Wins
0–5
Category Wins
5 stats compared
Fantasy
No fantasy data available for 2026.
🤖AI Analysis

The career statistics tell a clear story in this DE comparison. Fletcher Cox holds the advantage in 5 of 5 key categories, with Tackles representing the most decisive gap — a 226.4% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Fletcher Cox's Tackles of 519 compared to Al Wallace's 159 represents a 226.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Al Wallace falls 47% below the career average of 300 in this category while Fletcher Cox exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Fletcher Cox's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Pass Deflections, where Al Wallace posts 13 against Fletcher Cox's 17 — a gap of just 30.8%. Al Wallace can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Pass Deflections is the statistical ammunition for the Al Wallace side.

Defensive impact in the NFL is notoriously difficult to quantify. Sacks and tackles capture individual production, but disruption, coverage grades and run-stopping ability paint the complete picture of defensive excellence.

Fletcher Cox wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 0. The 226.4% gap in Tackles alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Fletcher Cox's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, Al Wallace or Fletcher Cox?

Fletcher Cox holds the statistical edge, winning 5 of 5 categories in this career comparison. Fletcher Cox's Tackles of 519 versus Al Wallace's 159 is the most decisive factor — a 226.4% difference.

How do Al Wallace and Fletcher Cox compare in Tackles?

Al Wallace career Tackles: 159. Fletcher Cox career Tackles: 519. Fletcher Cox leads by 226.4% — dramatically ahead in this key DE metric.

Who had the better overall career, Al Wallace or Fletcher Cox?

Based on career statistics, Fletcher Cox edges Al Wallace 5-0 across key categories. Fletcher Cox's Tackles of 519 leads Al Wallace's 159 by 226.4%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
Al Wallace vs Fletcher Cox
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here