Al Woods vs John Randle Career Stats Comparison
The career statistics tell a clear story in this DT comparison. John Randle holds the advantage in 4 of 5 key categories, with Sacks representing the most decisive gap — a 1275% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
John Randle's Sacks of 137.5 compared to Al Woods's 10 represents a 1275% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Al Woods falls 50% below the career average of 20 in this category while John Randle exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for John Randle's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Pass Deflections, where Al Woods posts 7 against John Randle's 9 — a gap of just 28.6%. Al Woods can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Pass Deflections is the statistical ammunition for the Al Woods side.
Defensive impact in the NFL is notoriously difficult to quantify. Sacks and tackles capture individual production, but disruption, coverage grades and run-stopping ability paint the complete picture of defensive excellence.
John Randle wins this head to head comparison decisively — 4 categories to 1. The 1275% gap in Sacks alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms John Randle's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.
Who is better, Al Woods or John Randle?
John Randle holds the statistical edge, winning 4 of 5 categories in this career comparison. John Randle's Sacks of 137.5 versus Al Woods's 10 is the most decisive factor — a 1275% difference.
How do Al Woods and John Randle compare in Sacks?
Al Woods career Sacks: 10. John Randle career Sacks: 137.5. John Randle leads by 1275% — dramatically ahead in this key DT metric.
Who had the better overall career, Al Woods or John Randle?
Based on career statistics, John Randle edges Al Woods 4-1 across key categories. John Randle's Sacks of 137.5 leads Al Woods's 10 by 1275%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
