Al Woods or Laiatu Latu? The NFL Stat Breakdown
The career statistics tell a clear story in this DT comparison. Al Woods holds the advantage in 4 of 5 key categories, with Games Played representing the most decisive gap — a 335.1% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
Al Woods's Games Played of 161 compared to Laiatu Latu's 37 represents a 335.1% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Al Woods's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Pass Deflections, where Al Woods posts 7 against Laiatu Latu's 6 — a gap of just 16.7%. Laiatu Latu can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Pass Deflections is the statistical ammunition for the Laiatu Latu side.
Defensive impact in the NFL is notoriously difficult to quantify. Sacks and tackles capture individual production, but disruption, coverage grades and run-stopping ability paint the complete picture of defensive excellence.
Al Woods wins this head to head comparison decisively — 4 categories to 1. The 335.1% gap in Games Played alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Al Woods's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.
Who is better, Al Woods or Laiatu Latu?
Al Woods holds the statistical edge, winning 4 of 5 categories in this career comparison. Al Woods's Games Played of 161 versus Laiatu Latu's 37 is the most decisive factor — a 335.1% difference.
How do Al Woods and Laiatu Latu compare in Games Played?
Al Woods career Games Played: 161. Laiatu Latu career Games Played: 37. Al Woods leads by 335.1% — dramatically ahead in this key DT metric.
Who had the better overall career, Al Woods or Laiatu Latu?
Based on career statistics, Al Woods edges Laiatu Latu 4-1 across key categories. Al Woods's Games Played of 161 leads Laiatu Latu's 37 by 335.1%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
