Alan Cross vs Clinton Portis Career Stats Comparison
The career statistics tell a clear story in this TE comparison. Clinton Portis holds the advantage in 3 of 3 key categories, with Receiving Yards representing the most decisive gap — a 1821.9% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
Clinton Portis's Receiving Yards of 2,018 compared to Alan Cross's 105 represents a 1821.9% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Alan Cross falls 97.9% below the career average of 5000 in this category while Clinton Portis exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Clinton Portis's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Games Played, where Alan Cross posts 36 against Clinton Portis's 113 — a gap of just 213.9%. Alan Cross can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Games Played is the statistical ammunition for the Alan Cross side.
The tight end position demands a rare combination of size, athleticism and football IQ. Career receiving production at tight end reflects the ability to dominate as a mismatch weapon, red zone threat and reliable safety valve.
Clinton Portis wins this head to head comparison decisively — 3 categories to 0. The 1821.9% gap in Receiving Yards alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Clinton Portis's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.
Who is better, Alan Cross or Clinton Portis?
Clinton Portis holds the statistical edge, winning 3 of 3 categories in this career comparison. Clinton Portis's Receiving Yards of 2,018 versus Alan Cross's 105 is the most decisive factor — a 1821.9% difference.
How do Alan Cross and Clinton Portis compare in Receiving Yards?
Alan Cross career Receiving Yards: 105. Clinton Portis career Receiving Yards: 2,018. Clinton Portis leads by 1821.9% — dramatically ahead in this key TE metric.
Who had the better overall career, Alan Cross or Clinton Portis?
Based on career statistics, Clinton Portis edges Alan Cross 3-0 across key categories. Clinton Portis's Receiving Yards of 2,018 leads Alan Cross's 105 by 1821.9%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
