Alan Ricard or Jarrod Baxter? The NFL Stat Breakdown

The career statistics tell a clear story in this RB comparison. Alan Ricard holds the advantage in 5 of 5 key categories, with Rushing Yards representing the most decisive gap — a 1053.3% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Alan Ricard's Rushing Yards of 173 compared to Jarrod Baxter's 15 represents a 1053.3% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Jarrod Baxter falls 99.7% below the career average of 5500 in this category while Alan Ricard exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Alan Ricard's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Games Played, where Alan Ricard posts 53 against Jarrod Baxter's 32 — a gap of just 65.6%. Jarrod Baxter can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Games Played is the statistical ammunition for the Jarrod Baxter side.

Running back careers are defined by efficiency as much as volume. Yards per carry separates elite backs from good ones, while receiving ability from the backfield has become increasingly valuable in the modern NFL.

Alan Ricard wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 0. The 1053.3% gap in Rushing Yards alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Alan Ricard's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.