Albert Wilson or Davone Bess? The NFL Stat Breakdown
The career statistics tell a clear story in this WR comparison. Davone Bess holds the advantage in 5 of 6 key categories, with Targets representing the most decisive gap — a 74.9% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
Davone Bess's Targets of 586 compared to Albert Wilson's 335 represents a 74.9% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Davone Bess's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Games Played, where Albert Wilson posts 89 against Davone Bess's 91 — a gap of just 2.2%. Albert Wilson can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Games Played is the statistical ammunition for the Albert Wilson side.
Wide receiver evaluation centers on yards and touchdowns, but yards per reception reveals explosiveness while receptions indicate target volume and reliability. The greatest receivers in NFL history excel in all three.
Davone Bess wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 1. The 74.9% gap in Targets alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Davone Bess's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.
Who is better, Albert Wilson or Davone Bess?
Davone Bess holds the statistical edge, winning 5 of 6 categories in this career comparison. Davone Bess's Targets of 586 versus Albert Wilson's 335 is the most decisive factor — a 74.9% difference.
How do Albert Wilson and Davone Bess compare in Targets?
Albert Wilson career Targets: 335. Davone Bess career Targets: 586. Davone Bess leads by 74.9% — dramatically ahead in this key WR metric.
Who had the better overall career, Albert Wilson or Davone Bess?
Based on career statistics, Davone Bess edges Albert Wilson 5-1 across key categories. Davone Bess's Targets of 586 leads Albert Wilson's 335 by 74.9%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.