Comparing Albert Wilson and Jordan Addison Head to Head

This is as close as it gets. Albert Wilson and Jordan Addison split the statistical categories evenly — 3 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested WR comparisons in NFL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Jordan Addison's Rec Touchdowns of 23 compared to Albert Wilson's 12 represents a 91.7% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Albert Wilson falls 73.3% below the career average of 45 in this category while Jordan Addison exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Jordan Addison's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Receiving Yards, where Albert Wilson posts 2,499 against Jordan Addison's 2,507 — virtually identical figures. Jordan Addison can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Receiving Yards is the statistical ammunition for the Jordan Addison side.

Wide receiver evaluation centers on yards and touchdowns, but yards per reception reveals explosiveness while receptions indicate target volume and reliability. The greatest receivers in NFL history excel in all three.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Jordan Addison claims the tiebreaker through Rec Touchdowns advantage — a 91.7% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NFL debate.