Albert Young or T.J. Hockenson? The NFL Stat Breakdown

The career statistics tell a clear story in this RB comparison. T.J. Hockenson holds the advantage in 3 of 3 key categories, with Receiving Yards representing the most decisive gap — a 43245.5% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

T.J. Hockenson's Receiving Yards of 4,768 compared to Albert Young's 11 represents a 43245.5% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for T.J. Hockenson's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Games Played, where Albert Young posts 10 against T.J. Hockenson's 105 — a gap of just 950%. Albert Young can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Games Played is the statistical ammunition for the Albert Young side.

Running back careers are defined by efficiency as much as volume. Yards per carry separates elite backs from good ones, while receiving ability from the backfield has become increasingly valuable in the modern NFL.

T.J. Hockenson wins this head to head comparison decisively — 3 categories to 0. The 43245.5% gap in Receiving Yards alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms T.J. Hockenson's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.