Alex Smith vs T.J. Hockenson Career Stats Comparison
The career statistics tell a clear story in this TE comparison. T.J. Hockenson holds the advantage in 5 of 6 key categories, with Targets representing the most decisive gap — a 215.8% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
T.J. Hockenson's Targets of 641 compared to Alex Smith's 203 represents a 215.8% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for T.J. Hockenson's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Yards Per Reception, where Alex Smith posts 9.0 against T.J. Hockenson's 10.2 — a gap of just 13.3%. Alex Smith can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-1 tally suggests. In any debate, Yards Per Reception is the statistical ammunition for the Alex Smith side.
The tight end position demands a rare combination of size, athleticism and football IQ. Career receiving production at tight end reflects the ability to dominate as a mismatch weapon, red zone threat and reliable safety valve.
T.J. Hockenson wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 1. The 215.8% gap in Targets alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms T.J. Hockenson's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.
Who is better, Alex Smith or T.J. Hockenson?
T.J. Hockenson holds the statistical edge, winning 5 of 6 categories in this career comparison. T.J. Hockenson's Targets of 641 versus Alex Smith's 203 is the most decisive factor — a 215.8% difference.
How do Alex Smith and T.J. Hockenson compare in Targets?
Alex Smith career Targets: 203. T.J. Hockenson career Targets: 641. T.J. Hockenson leads by 215.8% — dramatically ahead in this key TE metric.
Who had the better overall career, Alex Smith or T.J. Hockenson?
Based on career statistics, T.J. Hockenson edges Alex Smith 5-1 across key categories. T.J. Hockenson's Targets of 641 leads Alex Smith's 203 by 215.8%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
