HEADtoHEADSTATS
Armando Allen
RB · CHI
VS
NFL
Clinton Portis
RB · WAS⚡ 5–0
Home→NFL→Armando Allen vs Clinton Portis

Is Armando Allen Better Than Clinton Portis? NFL Stats Decide

↓ Loses
Armando Allen
Armando Allen
RB · CHI
VS
NFL
⚡ Winner
Clinton Portis
Clinton Portis
RB · WAS
Career Stats
172
Rushing Yards
9,923
16
Receiving Yards
2,018
N/A
Rush Touchdowns
75
4.1
Yards Per Carry
4.5
2
Receptions
247
17
Games Played
113
Statistical Verdict
Clinton Portis Wins
0–5
Category Wins
6 stats compared
Fantasy
No fantasy data available for 2026.
🤖AI Analysis

The career statistics tell a clear story in this RB comparison. Clinton Portis holds the advantage in 5 of 5 key categories, with Receiving Yards representing the most decisive gap — a 12512.5% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Clinton Portis's Receiving Yards of 2,018 compared to Armando Allen's 16 represents a 12512.5% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Clinton Portis's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Yards Per Carry, where Armando Allen posts 4.1 against Clinton Portis's 4.5 — a gap of just 9.8%. Armando Allen can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Yards Per Carry is the statistical ammunition for the Armando Allen side.

Running back careers are defined by efficiency as much as volume. Yards per carry separates elite backs from good ones, while receiving ability from the backfield has become increasingly valuable in the modern NFL.

Clinton Portis wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 0. The 12512.5% gap in Receiving Yards alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Clinton Portis's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, Armando Allen or Clinton Portis?

Clinton Portis holds the statistical edge, winning 5 of 5 categories in this career comparison. Clinton Portis's Receiving Yards of 2,018 versus Armando Allen's 16 is the most decisive factor — a 12512.5% difference.

How do Armando Allen and Clinton Portis compare in Receiving Yards?

Armando Allen career Receiving Yards: 16. Clinton Portis career Receiving Yards: 2,018. Clinton Portis leads by 12512.5% — dramatically ahead in this key RB metric.

Who had the better overall career, Armando Allen or Clinton Portis?

Based on career statistics, Clinton Portis edges Armando Allen 5-0 across key categories. Clinton Portis's Receiving Yards of 2,018 leads Armando Allen's 16 by 12512.5%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
Armando Allen vs Clinton Portis
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here