HEADtoHEADSTATS
Bob Hayes
WR · SF
VS
NFL
Larry Fitzgerald
WR · ARI
Home→NFL→Bob Hayes vs Larry Fitzgerald

Bob Hayes vs Larry Fitzgerald Career Stats Comparison

Bob Hayes
Bob Hayes
WR · SF
VS
NFL
Career Stats
N/A
Receiving Yards
17,492
N/A
Rec Touchdowns
121
N/A
Yards Per Reception
12.2
N/A
Receptions
1432
N/A
Games Played
263
N/A
Targets
2053
Statistical Verdict
🤝 It's a Tie
0–0
Category Wins
6 stats compared
Fantasy
No fantasy data available for 2026.
🤖AI Analysis

The career statistics for Bob Hayes and Larry Fitzgerald present an interesting comparison at the WR position in NFL. Both players bring unique strengths that make this head to head matchup worth examining across every available metric.

Without a clear statistical advantage in any single category, this comparison is defined by the overall body of work each player produced across their career.

Across the full range of career statistics, Larry Fitzgerald remains competitive in several categories — a reminder that the overall comparison is closer than the final 0-0 category tally might suggest.

Wide receiver evaluation centers on yards and touchdowns, but yards per reception reveals explosiveness while receptions indicate target volume and reliability. The greatest receivers in NFL history excel in all three.

The statistical comparison between Bob Hayes and Larry Fitzgerald is one of NFL's most evenly matched debates. The numbers do not produce a clear winner, making this a matchup where context, era and personal preference ultimately determine the verdict.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, Bob Hayes or Larry Fitzgerald?

Bob Hayes and Larry Fitzgerald are statistically evenly matched across the compared categories.

Who had the better overall career, Bob Hayes or Larry Fitzgerald?

Bob Hayes and Larry Fitzgerald are evenly matched — the statistics do not produce a clear career winner.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
Bob Hayes vs Larry Fitzgerald
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here