HEADtoHEADSTATS
Dee Alford
CB · ATL
VS
NFL
Deltha O'Neal
CB · NE⚡ 3–2
Home→NFL→Dee Alford vs Deltha O'Neal

Is Dee Alford Better Than Deltha O'Neal? NFL Stats Decide

↓ Loses
Dee Alford
Dee Alford
CB · ATL
VS
NFL
⚡ Winner
Deltha O'Neal
Deltha O'Neal
CB · NE
Career Stats
227
Tackles
388
3.5
Sacks
1
4
Interceptions
34
38
Pass Deflections
98
67
Games Played
132
Statistical Verdict
Deltha O'Neal Wins
2–3
Category Wins
5 stats compared
Fantasy
No fantasy data available for 2026.
🤖AI Analysis

Few NFL comparisons generate more debate than Dee Alford vs Deltha O'Neal. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Deltha O'Neal takes 3 categories while Dee Alford claims 2, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the CB position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Dee Alford's Interceptions of 4 compared to Deltha O'Neal's 34 represents a 750% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Dee Alford's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Tackles, where Dee Alford posts 227 against Deltha O'Neal's 388 — a gap of just 70.9%. Dee Alford can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Tackles is the statistical ammunition for the Dee Alford side.

Defensive impact in the NFL is notoriously difficult to quantify. Sacks and tackles capture individual production, but disruption, coverage grades and run-stopping ability paint the complete picture of defensive excellence.

The verdict favors Deltha O'Neal — 3 categories to 2 — but Dee Alford makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Dee Alford has real statistical ammunition particularly in Tackles where the gap narrows to just 70.9%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, Dee Alford or Deltha O'Neal?

Deltha O'Neal holds the statistical edge, winning 3 of 5 categories in this career comparison. Deltha O'Neal's Interceptions of 4 versus Dee Alford's 34 is the most decisive factor — a 750% difference.

How do Dee Alford and Deltha O'Neal compare in Interceptions?

Dee Alford career Interceptions: 4. Deltha O'Neal career Interceptions: 34. Dee Alford leads by 750% — dramatically ahead in this key CB metric.

Who had the better overall career, Dee Alford or Deltha O'Neal?

Based on career statistics, Deltha O'Neal edges Dee Alford 3-2 across key categories. Deltha O'Neal's Interceptions of 4 leads Dee Alford's 34 by 750%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
Dee Alford vs Deltha O'Neal
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here