Is E.J. Bibbs Better Than Jimmy Graham? NFL Stats Decide
The career statistics tell a clear story in this TE comparison. Jimmy Graham holds the advantage in 3 of 3 key categories, with Targets representing the most decisive gap — a 55700% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
Jimmy Graham's Targets of 1116 compared to E.J. Bibbs's 2 represents a 55700% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Jimmy Graham's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Yards Per Reception, where E.J. Bibbs posts 7.0 against Jimmy Graham's 11.9 — a gap of just 70%. E.J. Bibbs can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Yards Per Reception is the statistical ammunition for the E.J. Bibbs side.
The tight end position demands a rare combination of size, athleticism and football IQ. Career receiving production at tight end reflects the ability to dominate as a mismatch weapon, red zone threat and reliable safety valve.
Jimmy Graham wins this head to head comparison decisively — 3 categories to 0. The 55700% gap in Targets alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Jimmy Graham's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.
Who is better, E.J. Bibbs or Jimmy Graham?
Jimmy Graham holds the statistical edge, winning 3 of 3 categories in this career comparison. Jimmy Graham's Targets of 1116 versus E.J. Bibbs's 2 is the most decisive factor — a 55700% difference.
How do E.J. Bibbs and Jimmy Graham compare in Targets?
E.J. Bibbs career Targets: 2. Jimmy Graham career Targets: 1116. Jimmy Graham leads by 55700% — dramatically ahead in this key TE metric.
Who had the better overall career, E.J. Bibbs or Jimmy Graham?
Based on career statistics, Jimmy Graham edges E.J. Bibbs 3-0 across key categories. Jimmy Graham's Targets of 1116 leads E.J. Bibbs's 2 by 55700%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
