Comparing E.J. Bibbs and Mark Andrews Head to Head
The career statistics tell a clear story in this TE comparison. Mark Andrews holds the advantage in 3 of 3 key categories, with Targets representing the most decisive gap — a 35900% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
Mark Andrews's Targets of 720 compared to E.J. Bibbs's 2 represents a 35900% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Mark Andrews's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Yards Per Reception, where E.J. Bibbs posts 7.0 against Mark Andrews's 12.2 — a gap of just 74.3%. E.J. Bibbs can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Yards Per Reception is the statistical ammunition for the E.J. Bibbs side.
The tight end position demands a rare combination of size, athleticism and football IQ. Career receiving production at tight end reflects the ability to dominate as a mismatch weapon, red zone threat and reliable safety valve.
Mark Andrews wins this head to head comparison decisively — 3 categories to 0. The 35900% gap in Targets alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Mark Andrews's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.
Who is better, E.J. Bibbs or Mark Andrews?
Mark Andrews holds the statistical edge, winning 3 of 3 categories in this career comparison. Mark Andrews's Targets of 720 versus E.J. Bibbs's 2 is the most decisive factor — a 35900% difference.
How do E.J. Bibbs and Mark Andrews compare in Targets?
E.J. Bibbs career Targets: 2. Mark Andrews career Targets: 720. Mark Andrews leads by 35900% — dramatically ahead in this key TE metric.
Who had the better overall career, E.J. Bibbs or Mark Andrews?
Based on career statistics, Mark Andrews edges E.J. Bibbs 3-0 across key categories. Mark Andrews's Targets of 720 leads E.J. Bibbs's 2 by 35900%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
