Comparing Jay Foreman and Teddy Lehman Head to Head

The career statistics tell a clear story in this LB comparison. Jay Foreman holds the advantage in 5 of 5 key categories, with Sacks representing the most decisive gap — a 350% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Jay Foreman's Sacks of 4.5 compared to Teddy Lehman's 1 represents a 350% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Teddy Lehman falls 95% below the career average of 20 in this category while Jay Foreman exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Jay Foreman's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Games Played, where Jay Foreman posts 82 against Teddy Lehman's 45 — a gap of just 82.2%. Teddy Lehman can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Games Played is the statistical ammunition for the Teddy Lehman side.

Defensive impact in the NFL is notoriously difficult to quantify. Sacks and tackles capture individual production, but disruption, coverage grades and run-stopping ability paint the complete picture of defensive excellence.

Jay Foreman wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 0. The 350% gap in Sacks alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Jay Foreman's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.