Jon Alston vs Chris Bordano Career Stats Comparison

This is as close as it gets. Jon Alston and Chris Bordano split the statistical categories evenly — 2 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested LB comparisons in NFL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Chris Bordano's Sacks of 1 compared to Jon Alston's 0 represents a 100% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Jon Alston falls 100% below the career average of 20 in this category while Chris Bordano exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Chris Bordano's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Games Played, where Jon Alston posts 39 against Chris Bordano's 31 — a gap of just 25.8%. Chris Bordano can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 2-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Games Played is the statistical ammunition for the Chris Bordano side.

Defensive impact in the NFL is notoriously difficult to quantify. Sacks and tackles capture individual production, but disruption, coverage grades and run-stopping ability paint the complete picture of defensive excellence.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Chris Bordano claims the tiebreaker through Sacks advantage — a 100% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NFL debate.