HEADtoHEADSTATS
Phil Mafah
RB · DAL
VS
NFL
C.J. Anderson
RB · DET⚡ 5–0
Home→NFL→Phil Mafah vs C.J. Anderson

Is Phil Mafah Better Than C.J. Anderson? NFL Stats Decide

↓ Loses
Phil Mafah
Phil Mafah
RB · DAL
VS
NFL
⚡ Winner
C.J. Anderson
C.J. Anderson
RB · DET
Career Stats
18
Rushing Yards
3,497
11
Receiving Yards
900
N/A
Rush Touchdowns
22
3.6
Yards Per Carry
4.5
2
Receptions
108
1
Games Played
71
Statistical Verdict
C.J. Anderson Wins
0–5
Category Wins
6 stats compared
Fantasy
No fantasy data available for 2026.
🤖AI Analysis

The career statistics tell a clear story in this RB comparison. C.J. Anderson holds the advantage in 5 of 5 key categories, with Rushing Yards representing the most decisive gap — a 19327.8% difference that separates these two NFL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

C.J. Anderson's Rushing Yards of 3,497 compared to Phil Mafah's 18 represents a 19327.8% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Phil Mafah falls 99.7% below the career average of 5500 in this category while C.J. Anderson exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for C.J. Anderson's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Yards Per Carry, where Phil Mafah posts 3.6 against C.J. Anderson's 4.5 — a gap of just 25%. Phil Mafah can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 5-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Yards Per Carry is the statistical ammunition for the Phil Mafah side.

Running back careers are defined by efficiency as much as volume. Yards per carry separates elite backs from good ones, while receiving ability from the backfield has become increasingly valuable in the modern NFL.

C.J. Anderson wins this head to head comparison decisively — 5 categories to 0. The 19327.8% gap in Rushing Yards alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms C.J. Anderson's statistical superiority in this NFL career comparison.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, Phil Mafah or C.J. Anderson?

C.J. Anderson holds the statistical edge, winning 5 of 5 categories in this career comparison. C.J. Anderson's Rushing Yards of 3,497 versus Phil Mafah's 18 is the most decisive factor — a 19327.8% difference.

How do Phil Mafah and C.J. Anderson compare in Rushing Yards?

Phil Mafah career Rushing Yards: 18. C.J. Anderson career Rushing Yards: 3,497. C.J. Anderson leads by 19327.8% — dramatically ahead in this key RB metric.

Who had the better overall career, Phil Mafah or C.J. Anderson?

Based on career statistics, C.J. Anderson edges Phil Mafah 5-0 across key categories. C.J. Anderson's Rushing Yards of 3,497 leads Phil Mafah's 18 by 19327.8%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
Phil Mafah vs C.J. Anderson
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here