Phil Mafah vs Rich Alexis: Who Wins on NFL Stats?
Few NFL comparisons generate more debate than Phil Mafah vs Rich Alexis. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Phil Mafah takes 1 categories while Rich Alexis claims 0, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the RB position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.
Phil Mafah's Yards Per Carry of 3.6 compared to Rich Alexis's 1.7 represents a 111.8% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Rich Alexis falls 58.5% below the career average of 4.1 in this category while Phil Mafah exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Phil Mafah's edge.
Across the full range of career statistics, Rich Alexis remains competitive in several categories — a reminder that the overall comparison is closer than the final 1-0 category tally might suggest.
Running back careers are defined by efficiency as much as volume. Yards per carry separates elite backs from good ones, while receiving ability from the backfield has become increasingly valuable in the modern NFL.
The verdict favors Phil Mafah — 1 categories to 0 — but Rich Alexis makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Rich Alexis has real statistical ammunition. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.
Who is better, Phil Mafah or Rich Alexis?
Phil Mafah holds the statistical edge, winning 1 of 1 categories in this career comparison. Phil Mafah's Yards Per Carry of 3.6 versus Rich Alexis's 1.7 is the most decisive factor — a 111.8% difference.
How do Phil Mafah and Rich Alexis compare in Yards Per Carry?
Phil Mafah career Yards Per Carry: 3.6. Rich Alexis career Yards Per Carry: 1.7. Phil Mafah leads by 111.8% — dramatically ahead in this key RB metric.
Who had the better overall career, Phil Mafah or Rich Alexis?
Based on career statistics, Phil Mafah edges Rich Alexis 1-0 across key categories. Phil Mafah's Yards Per Carry of 3.6 leads Rich Alexis's 1.7 by 111.8%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
