Alexander Kerfoot vs Matt Boldy: Who Wins on NHL Stats?

This is as close as it gets. Alexander Kerfoot and Matt Boldy split the statistical categories evenly — 3 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NHL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Matt Boldy's Plus/Minus of 58 compared to Alexander Kerfoot's -13 represents a 346.2% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Matt Boldy's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Assists, where Alexander Kerfoot posts 204 against Matt Boldy's 196 — a gap of just 4.1%. Matt Boldy can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Assists is the statistical ammunition for the Matt Boldy side.

Hockey's greatest players accumulate points through both goal scoring and playmaking. The balance between goals and assists often reveals a player's style — pure scorer versus pass-first playmaker.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Matt Boldy claims the tiebreaker through Plus/Minus advantage — a 346.2% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NHL debate.