Is Auston Matthews Better Than William Nylander? NHL Stats Decide

This is as close as it gets. Auston Matthews and William Nylander split the statistical categories evenly — 3 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested C comparisons in NHL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Auston Matthews's Plus/Minus of 145 compared to William Nylander's 18 represents a 705.6% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Auston Matthews's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Games Played, where Auston Matthews posts 691 against William Nylander's 752 — a gap of just 8.8%. William Nylander can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 3-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Games Played is the statistical ammunition for the William Nylander side.

Hockey's greatest players accumulate points through both goal scoring and playmaking. The balance between goals and assists often reveals a player's style — pure scorer versus pass-first playmaker.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Auston Matthews claims the tiebreaker through Plus/Minus advantage — a 705.6% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NHL debate.