Cale Makar or Paul LaDue? The NHL Stat Breakdown
The career statistics tell a clear story in this D comparison. Cale Makar holds the advantage in 6 of 6 key categories, with Plus/Minus representing the most decisive gap — a 8250% difference that separates these two NHL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.
Cale Makar's Plus/Minus of 167 compared to Paul LaDue's -2 represents a 8250% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Cale Makar's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Penalty Minutes, where Cale Makar posts 134 against Paul LaDue's 22 — a gap of just 509.1%. Paul LaDue can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 6-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Penalty Minutes is the statistical ammunition for the Paul LaDue side.
Defensive play in the NHL is measured through a combination of offensive contribution and plus/minus rating. Elite defensemen contribute points while anchoring their team's defensive structure — a balance that defines the position's greatest players.
Cale Makar wins this head to head comparison decisively — 6 categories to 0. The 8250% gap in Plus/Minus alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Cale Makar's statistical superiority in this NHL career comparison.
Who is better, Cale Makar or Paul LaDue?
Cale Makar holds the statistical edge, winning 6 of 6 categories in this career comparison. Cale Makar's Plus/Minus of 167 versus Paul LaDue's -2 is the most decisive factor — a 8250% difference.
How do Cale Makar and Paul LaDue compare in Plus/Minus?
Cale Makar career Plus/Minus: 167. Paul LaDue career Plus/Minus: -2. Cale Makar leads by 8250% — dramatically ahead in this key D metric.
Who had the better overall career, Cale Makar or Paul LaDue?
Based on career statistics, Cale Makar edges Paul LaDue 6-0 across key categories. Cale Makar's Plus/Minus of 167 leads Paul LaDue's -2 by 8250%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.
