Colten Ellis or Connor Ingram? The NHL Stat Breakdown
This is as close as it gets. Colten Ellis and Connor Ingram split the statistical categories evenly — 2 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NHL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.
Connor Ingram's Shutouts of 9 compared to Colten Ellis's 1 represents a 800% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Connor Ingram's edge.
The most competitive category in this matchup is Save Percentage, where Colten Ellis posts 90.3% against Connor Ingram's 90.1% — virtually identical figures. Connor Ingram can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 2-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Save Percentage is the statistical ammunition for the Connor Ingram side.
Goaltending is evaluated through save percentage and goals against average — complementary metrics that together capture both consistency and quality of saves made under pressure.
With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Connor Ingram claims the tiebreaker through Shutouts advantage — a 800% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NHL debate.
Who is better, Colten Ellis or Connor Ingram?
Colten Ellis holds the statistical edge, winning 2 of 4 categories in this career comparison. Colten Ellis's Shutouts of 9 versus Connor Ingram's 1 is the most decisive factor — a 800% difference.
How do Colten Ellis and Connor Ingram compare in Shutouts?
Colten Ellis career Shutouts: 1. Connor Ingram career Shutouts: 9. Connor Ingram leads by 800% — dramatically ahead in this key G metric.
Who had the better overall career, Colten Ellis or Connor Ingram?
Based on career statistics, Colten Ellis edges Connor Ingram 2-2 across key categories. Colten Ellis's Shutouts of 9 leads Connor Ingram's 1 by 800%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.





