HEADtoHEADSTATS
Connor Hellebuyck
G · WPG
VS
NHL
Nathan MacKinnon
C · COL⚡ 1–0
Home→NHL→Connor Hellebuyck vs Nathan MacKinnon

Is Connor Hellebuyck Better Than Nathan MacKinnon? NHL Stats Decide

↓ Loses
Connor Hellebuyck
Connor Hellebuyck
G · WPG
VS
NHL
⚡ Winner
Nathan MacKinnon
Nathan MacKinnon
C · COL
Career Stats
625
Games Played
960
2.58
Goals Against Avg
N/A
91.6%
Save Percentage
N/A
45
Shutouts
N/A
N/A
Goals
426
N/A
Assists
732
N/A
Points
1158
N/A
Plus/Minus
229
N/A
Penalty Minutes
440
Statistical Verdict
Nathan MacKinnon Wins
0–1
Category Wins
9 stats compared
🤖AI Analysis

Few NHL comparisons generate more debate than Connor Hellebuyck vs Nathan MacKinnon. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Nathan MacKinnon takes 1 categories while Connor Hellebuyck claims 0, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the G position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Nathan MacKinnon's Games Played of 960 compared to Connor Hellebuyck's 625 represents a 53.6% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Nathan MacKinnon's edge.

Across the full range of career statistics, Connor Hellebuyck remains competitive in several categories — a reminder that the overall comparison is closer than the final 1-0 category tally might suggest.

Goaltending is evaluated through save percentage and goals against average — complementary metrics that together capture both consistency and quality of saves made under pressure.

The verdict favors Nathan MacKinnon — 1 categories to 0 — but Connor Hellebuyck makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Connor Hellebuyck has real statistical ammunition. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.

❓Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better, Connor Hellebuyck or Nathan MacKinnon?

Nathan MacKinnon holds the statistical edge, winning 1 of 1 categories in this career comparison. Nathan MacKinnon's Games Played of 960 versus Connor Hellebuyck's 625 is the most decisive factor — a 53.6% difference.

How do Connor Hellebuyck and Nathan MacKinnon compare in Games Played?

Connor Hellebuyck career Games Played: 625. Nathan MacKinnon career Games Played: 960. Nathan MacKinnon leads by 53.6% — dramatically ahead in this key G metric.

Who had the better overall career, Connor Hellebuyck or Nathan MacKinnon?

Based on career statistics, Nathan MacKinnon edges Connor Hellebuyck 1-0 across key categories. Nathan MacKinnon's Games Played of 960 leads Connor Hellebuyck's 625 by 53.6%, providing the clearest statistical evidence of the career advantage.

Share this matchup
Community Vote — Who's Better?
💬 Fan Debate — 0 Comments
Connor Hellebuyck vs Nathan MacKinnon
Drop Your Take
0/500
Advertisement — Google AdSense Goes Here