Comparing Connor Ingram and Dustin Wolf Head to Head

This is as close as it gets. Connor Ingram and Dustin Wolf split the statistical categories evenly — 2 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NHL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

Connor Ingram's Shutouts of 9 compared to Dustin Wolf's 5 represents a 80% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Connor Ingram's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Save Percentage, where Connor Ingram posts 90.1% against Dustin Wolf's 90.2% — virtually identical figures. Dustin Wolf can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 2-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Save Percentage is the statistical ammunition for the Dustin Wolf side.

Goaltending is evaluated through save percentage and goals against average — complementary metrics that together capture both consistency and quality of saves made under pressure.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. Connor Ingram claims the tiebreaker through Shutouts advantage — a 80% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NHL debate.