Comparing Connor Ingram and Jordan Binnington Head to Head

The career statistics tell a clear story in this G comparison. Jordan Binnington holds the advantage in 4 of 4 key categories, with Games Played representing the most decisive gap — a 183.6% difference that separates these two NHL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Jordan Binnington's Games Played of 380 compared to Connor Ingram's 134 represents a 183.6% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Jordan Binnington's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Save Percentage, where Connor Ingram posts 90.1% against Jordan Binnington's 90.3% — virtually identical figures. Connor Ingram can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Save Percentage is the statistical ammunition for the Connor Ingram side.

Goaltending is evaluated through save percentage and goals against average — complementary metrics that together capture both consistency and quality of saves made under pressure.

Jordan Binnington wins this head to head comparison decisively — 4 categories to 0. The 183.6% gap in Games Played alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Jordan Binnington's statistical superiority in this NHL career comparison.