Is Jet Greaves Better Than John Gibson? NHL Stats Decide

This is as close as it gets. Jet Greaves and John Gibson split the statistical categories evenly — 2 apiece — making this one of the most genuinely contested G comparisons in NHL history. When the numbers are this balanced, the debate comes down to which statistics matter most to you.

John Gibson's Games Played of 563 compared to Jet Greaves's 76 represents a 640.8% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for John Gibson's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Save Percentage, where Jet Greaves posts 91.3% against John Gibson's 90.9% — virtually identical figures. John Gibson can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 2-2 tally suggests. In any debate, Save Percentage is the statistical ammunition for the John Gibson side.

Goaltending is evaluated through save percentage and goals against average — complementary metrics that together capture both consistency and quality of saves made under pressure.

With categories split evenly, this comparison ultimately comes down to which statistics matter most to you. John Gibson claims the tiebreaker through Games Played advantage — a 640.8% edge — but reasonable people can, and do, argue both sides of this NHL debate.