Anthony Grundy vs Grant Hill: Who Wins on NBA Stats?

Few NBA comparisons generate more debate than Anthony Grundy vs Grant Hill. The numbers reveal a genuinely competitive matchup — Anthony Grundy takes 4 categories while Grant Hill claims 3, making this one of the closer head to head comparisons at the PG position. Every statistical category matters in a matchup this tight.

Grant Hill's Points Per Game of 16.7 compared to Anthony Grundy's 4.3 represents a 288.4% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. Anthony Grundy falls 69.7% below the career average of 14.2 in this category while Grant Hill exceeds it. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Grant Hill's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Field Goal %, where Anthony Grundy posts 50% against Grant Hill's 48.0% — a gap of just 4.2%. Grant Hill can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-3 tally suggests. In any debate, Field Goal % is the statistical ammunition for the Grant Hill side.

In NBA history, backcourt players are judged on their ability to create offense for themselves and teammates alike. Points per game captures scoring but assists and efficiency metrics reveal the complete offensive picture.

The verdict favors Anthony Grundy — 4 categories to 3 — but Grant Hill makes this far from a one-sided debate. Anyone building the case for Grant Hill has real statistical ammunition particularly in Field Goal % where the gap narrows to just 4.2%. The numbers have spoken, but the argument will continue.