Comparing Connor Ingram and Scott Wedgewood Head to Head

The career statistics tell a clear story in this G comparison. Scott Wedgewood holds the advantage in 4 of 4 key categories, with Games Played representing the most decisive gap — a 50.7% difference that separates these two NHL players. This is not a close debate on the numbers.

Scott Wedgewood's Games Played of 202 compared to Connor Ingram's 134 represents a 50.7% advantage — dramatically better than their counterpart in this critical category. It is the single most decisive number in this comparison and the clearest statistical argument for Scott Wedgewood's edge.

The most competitive category in this matchup is Save Percentage, where Connor Ingram posts 90.1% against Scott Wedgewood's 90.9% — virtually identical figures. Connor Ingram can point to this as evidence that the overall comparison is closer than the final 4-0 tally suggests. In any debate, Save Percentage is the statistical ammunition for the Connor Ingram side.

Goaltending is evaluated through save percentage and goals against average — complementary metrics that together capture both consistency and quality of saves made under pressure.

Scott Wedgewood wins this head to head comparison decisively — 4 categories to 0. The 50.7% gap in Games Played alone makes a compelling case, but the consistency across multiple categories confirms Scott Wedgewood's statistical superiority in this NHL career comparison.